More public outrage as details come spilling out of the Kaupthing loan book

by alda on August 4, 2009

Public outrage continued today over the injunction ordered against RÚV [the Icelandic state broadcaster], aimed at stopping it from processing the details of the Kaupthing loan book.

Bizarrely, an injunction has not been ordered against other media – only the state broadcaster, although the other media have been sternly instructed by Kaupthing to ignore the WikiLeaks report, OR ELSE. At the same time everybody knows this injunction is a farce – the information has already been downloaded by everyone and his dog here in Iceland and besides, it’s still readily available online.

Some people are doing an excellent job at processing the information in the WikiLeaks article – including the excellent Dagblaðið NEI. It points out, among other things, that Kaupthing, which at the time of its privatization in the early part of this decade was estimated to be worth ISK 20 billion [USD 159 million], loaned its TEN LARGEST CLIENTS a grand total of ISK 1,500 billion [yes, you read that right] in the subsequent few years that it operated as a private banking institution.

Many of the largest recipients of loans from Kaupthing were shareholders in the bank, while the collateral for the loan were shares in the bank itself. [And if you're like me, this is the point where you're tempted to stop reading because the mind starts turning somersaults. Is it any wonder they need a team of highly-specialized experts to unravel all the endless knots and tangles in this sorry scenario? This is only the beginning!]

Meanwhile, the largest individual loan recipient was one Robert Tchenguiz, who I wrote about briefly in this post, which I’ll just revisit for a moment, if you’ll indulge me:

Tchenguiz was a shrewd and hard-nosed businessman who was flying high at the height of the financial boom. He owned assets throughout the UK and, indeed, Europe – including Iceland [in Exista, the largest shareholder in Kaupthing].

However, in late 2007 his luck began to turn, he started suffering heavy losses, amounting to hundreds of millions of pounds Sterling. By the time the credit crunch hit in late 2008 it is unlikely that Tchenguiz would have been able to secure credit anywhere – except from his pals at Kaupthing.

Indeed, Kaupthing kept lending Tchenguiz large amounts – tens of billions of ISK – right up until its collapse in October 2008. The British press even reported that he’d lost a cool billion pounds the day before Kaupthing collapsed. At the same time, it was virtually impossible for Icelandic companies to secure loans from the bank.

In February, New Kaupthing bank initiated court proceedings against Robert Tchenguiz to recover “an overdraft” of 643 million pounds Sterling [ISK 135 billion] which he had received from Old Kaupthing prior to the collapse. Evidently the collateral for the “overdraft” was in “indirect investments and other types of air” [according to NEI.].

Tchenguiz’s brother Vincent Tchenguiz also received a loan from Kaupthing, albeit not as generous as the one granted to Robert: it only amounted to EUR 208.7 million at the time of the collapse. In the slides published on WikiLeak, the notes accompanying the granting of the loan state that Vincent is an “individual well known to Kaupþing and its senior management. These facilities provide liquidity to enable him to make other investments.” Ah. Glad he checked out well, then.

Meanwhile, the debts owed to Kaupthing bank last fall by these two brothers ONLY thus amounted to ISK 232 billion. That works out to ISK 725,000 [USD 5,777] per Icelandic citizen, ISK 2.9 million [USD 23,107] per four-person family. To be fair, there may be some assets owned by the two that will go towards lowering the debt … but considering the fact that Kaupthing has already had to launch court proceedings to recover the “overdraft” awarded to Robert T. I wouldn’t put my money [ha!] on it being too much.

THIS my friends, is the sort of information covered in the report leaked to WikiLeaks that Kaupthing bank insists the Icelandic public should not be informed about. And yet it is we, the Icelandic public, who have to shoulder the entire burden of the collapse.

Sure, I know the law is the law, and that this violates bank secrecy and all that shit. To which the only reasonable answer is: THEN THE LAW MUST BE CHANGED. This information is essential for the public to know. If there is to be any sort of restoration of peace and acceptance in this country, this sort of information MUST be accessible to the public. Period.

ANOTHER LOVELY DAY
Sunny and relatively warm, although already methinks I can feel a bit of an autumn chill in the air. Right now it’s 11°C [52F] and it feels like a wind is picking up. The sun came up at 4.44 am and set at 10.21.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

Paul H August 4, 2009 at 1:31 am

The truth will set you free.

Ann August 4, 2009 at 3:40 am

Wow. My head hurts. Wow.

Christian August 4, 2009 at 4:34 am

I am starting to like this blog! It breaks my heart how the human nature ultimately disappoint and I get very exited when I come across people that actually cares. Although reading this blog does not help my ever increasing anger towards the quasiscience that is called economy and the neverending stream of suits that seems to f**k things up for us.

Ljósmynd DE August 4, 2009 at 8:54 am

Finally, the story about the leaked Kaupthing loan book has made its way into the German media (FTD)

http://www.ftd.de/unternehmen/finanzdienstleister/:Islands-Finanzelite-am-Pranger-Eigner-pl%FCnderten-Kaupthing/548732.html

Kaupthing is still arousing public interest in Germany.

Dave Hambidge August 4, 2009 at 11:51 am

Welcome home, just in time to help inform the world on the real horror in iceland.

dave

ps Here you will find a UK view;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/5968231/Kaupthing-leak-exposes-loans.html

Alexander E. August 4, 2009 at 4:35 pm

Sure, I know the law is the law, and that this violates bank secrecy and all that shit. To which the only reasonable answer is: THEN THE LAW MUST BE CHANGED.

I don’t agree with you, Alda, on this one.
First of all, it was a claim of one party that something violated the bank secrecy. It’s up to a court to decide if such violation in fact took place. And – contrary to the laws of physics – these rules written by lawyers are very “flexible” as you know ;-)

The fact that some guy typed “Private and confidential” phrase doesn’t mean that such information is belongs to “bank secrets”.

And third – by reading these slides I came to the conclusion that this information is in fact a rather detailed confession about the crime (fraud). So any person who got hands on it is free to report about this crime. This right is above “privacy” right.
So there is no need to change any laws. Any sense neither as “new” laws would written (and interpreted) by same bunch of lawyers anyway ;-)

Lee August 4, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Good article. Probably only a revolution could purge the corruption of the past few years; the current political, business and legal systems are proving themselves particularly incapable of doing so. I liked the radical attitude in the second half of this Icelander’s article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/iris-lee/icelands-independent-peop_b_250298.html

Alexander E. August 4, 2009 at 6:03 pm

Probably only a revolution could…

Nei, takk.
Trust me, you won’t like the “results” :-(

Fred August 4, 2009 at 8:40 pm

The story has appeared on the Associated Press wire service. It’s not the initial leak that appeared, it’s the outrage over the injunction that was the story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Anton August 5, 2009 at 1:54 pm

Nice post Alda.. very interesting. Was looking for a synopsis of what happened.

The more I hear about what was going on at the top the more pissed I am about losing my (meagre.. I guess) share – around 1 million ISK lost in peningabref.

In the beginning I thought that it was my share of the loss (my part of the loss for the country), I was stupid enough to put my cash there so it was my responsibility. As I find out more about exactly why I have lost that money, I get more and more angry.

The scum at the top that were trying to make themselves even more money caused me to lose money that I worked hard to save.

You know what. It’s not really the scum that the banks were lending to that I care about. It’s the scum that were running the banks and allowed the loans to be given out in the first place. That’s where the real responsibility lies. The fact that some of them are the same scum that received the loans only elevates said scum to higher levels of scumminess.

Some (fairly large) degree of my anger also goes towards the regulators and lawmakers that allowed a system that could fall apart like this. I.e. having lax enough laws that allowed scum enough latitude to defraud the entire country.

/rant.
Anton

Leave a Comment